Curtis King wrote: > > On 20-Oct-08, at 7:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >>> >>> Please understand that even if we use MUST instead of SHOULD with >>> respect to namespace-awareness, the existing servers are not going to >>> be left behind. Newer servers and server versions are still going to >>> continue to support their legacy counterparts. The benefit of course >>> would be that eventually we will have a sterilized network, where >>> clients wouldn't need to worry about rolling out their own >>> (non-conforming) namespace handling. In my opinion this is a better >>> long term direction. >> >> I too think that is a worthy goal. The question is: how can we get there >> in a reasonable fashion? > > Why not limit the scope of XML-NAMES ? > > I think xml like this should be prohibited by the xmpp spec.
<snip/> Er yes, that *is* ugly. :) /psa
