Which is the bigger advantage, more exposure, more convenience, more bugs raised, and more pull requests.
I do however understand that its more complicated than it seems on the surface. But projects being posted on google code or bitbucket that almost puts me off contributing. Unfortunately this comes up every 6 months and seemingly the status quo doesn't work for people joining the XSF and some of the current membership (not that current efforts are not appreciated obviously). I'm happy to discuss again but we need to make a firm plan to either do something or remain as we are. On 1 Sep 2014 22:03, "Dave Cridland" <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > On 1 September 2014 21:43, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:43:57 +0100 >> Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: >> >> > Not all our contributors currently will use github. >> >> Who will not? And why? >> > > See Kurt's comment as to one possible reason why. > > I use it for both work and pleasure; I'm more in the camp of wanting to > avoid a proprietary outsourced lockin for a core concern. I don't mind a > mirror on github, but then people expect to do pull requests and issue > tracking. > > Dave. >
