On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:28, Kevin Smith <ke...@kismith.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Ashley Ward <ashley.w...@surevine.com> wrote: >> I can imagine a world of fairies and unicorns where (for example) we have an >> (openid enabled) gitlab, sufficiently automated that we have a repo per xep >> which is writable by the authors, but anyone can raise issues and pull >> requests against the xep. New issues and pull request notifications are sent >> to all the xep authors and copied to the standards list too. >> >> This should be eminently automatable (is that a word?) and fulfils a couple >> of requirements - firstly it fits the current process of xep authors >> essentially being the single point of responsibility for changes to the xep, >> but also allows an issue tracker per xep (which could be useful in itself >> and makes it more obvious which issue applies to which xep) and provides an >> easy route for anyone to raise issues or corrections. > > My gut reaction is that this seems like a sensible model.
And gitlab allows authentication via a github account too! http://doc.gitlab.com/ce/integration/omniauth.html — Ash
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
