On 20.03.2017 22:32, Dave Cridland wrote: > Loosely, this is OK, but, in order: > > 1) Section 6 must go. … This issue is a blocker for me.
I don't have much hope, but have to ask anyway: Would you consider a dual approach where we keep section 6, get the XEP into experimental while simultaneously work on creating a suitable SASL mech at the IETF? Alternatively, if we remove section 6, would you accept ISR as is? - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________