On 20.03.2017 22:32, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Loosely, this is OK, but, in order:
> 
> 1) Section 6 must go. … This issue is a blocker for me.

I don't have much hope, but have to ask anyway: Would you consider a
dual approach where we keep section 6, get the XEP into experimental
while simultaneously work on creating a suitable SASL mech at the IETF?

Alternatively, if we remove section 6, would you accept ISR as is?

- Florian




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to