On 21.03.2017 01:21, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/20/17 4:23 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On 20 March 2017 at 22:04, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote:
>>> On 20.03.2017 22:32, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> Incidentally, I think a token-based SASL mechanism might be generally
>> useful; 
> 
> We already have a token-based authentication mechanism for OAuth 2
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7628/> but perhaps that's not what
> you had in mind...

I've also looked into that RFC, but as far as I can tell:
- No channel binding
- No mutual authentication
- Does not signal the hash-algo as part of its SASL name

→ not suitable for ISR.

- Florian


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to