> I think an ns bump in 308 is better than a duplicate spec, really (unless 
> there’s something I’m missing).

I'm not strongly for a new spec., though I thought it might be more appropriate 
in this case given the aversion to changing Drafts and that it's already well 
implemented; also avoiding possible old-0048/new-0048 type issues.

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to