On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 17:20, Marvin W <x...@larma.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, long mail ahead. > > I'd like to express that I am very much unhappy where this is leading. >
Thanks for writing this; it's an excellent summary of where we are, and seems to have sparked some more constructive debate. (In other words, it's what I attempted and failed to do!) > So my conclusion: > - We can add the opt-out flag to 0393. Supporting it is SHOULD on the > recipient side and support for adding it is a MAY on the sender side. > Making support a MUST both on sending and receiving side is unrealistic > due to it just not being possible through transports and currently > deployed encryption. > - We put our energy into building a replacement (being it 0394 or > something completely different) instead of using it to make 0393 less > useful to harm its adoption. > I think the latter is correct, but I'm interested in exploring Kev's proposal around the former. Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
