Dave, If it ain't broke, don't fix it! - is my normal motto - but I stayed on 9.0 for as short a time as possible - I found it very unstable and moved quickly to 9.1 (thro 0.4). If you can get 9.1 cheaply, I would go for it. I have found it to be as stable as was my old Quadra on 6. something - it never crashed in four years. It seems to me that 9.1 is both quicker and more stable than 9.0
I know of no good reason to go beyond 9.1, unless running a G4. David >I have a Starmax 3000/200 which came with OS 7.6. I have upgraded in >steps through 8.5 et al to 9.0 It now feels slow and I noted a recent >comment about 9.1 being quicker than 9.0 > >Is it worth the bother upgrading to 9.2 - or is there a better halfway >stage ? -- StarMax is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... / Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com \ / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \ Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> StarMax list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/starmax.html> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/starmax%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! <http://www.applelinks.com>
