On 18-May-99 11:57:41 BST, John Wasilewski wrote:
>> >> For example, ok, so maybe the 060 can't decode the fax data quickly
>> >> enough on the fly (i.e. so data is lost at the serial interface).
> As a matter of fact I find it rather surprising that an 060 plus eg Surf
> Squirrel is /too slow/. Not as fast a processor as a Panty-um 200 I
> grant you but the 68060 has a reputation for a much more efficient
You're missing the point - as I understand it, the problem is that while
the Solo is sending the data to the serial port, STFax is decoding it
simultaneously. So, if the cpu isn't decoding it fast enough, STFax
can't keep up with the incoming data.
> Talking of the problem with Pace not helping with answers to your
> tech questions, how about copying to the user-base your e-mails to
> Pace, or posting on the web a not of your tel calls, faxes, letters to
> Pace? Then you'll get your custmoers behind you. We can do
> some energetic lobbying to help you obtain the info you need from
> them.
That's neither appropriate or professional, IMHO. Bombarding Pace isn't
going to do any good. I have found Pace to be very cooperative, even
if it does take ages to get a response. I think the problem in the case
of the Solo is that Pace are the "middlemen" - they didn't make/design
the Solo, so I guess they really don't know the answer and are trying to
find out from company who designed the Solo.
--
Oliver Roberts /~\ ___(~)__ __ |~~~/~| UIN: 34640231
Norwich, UK | o | ' |~/. /. | | ~|| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|_|_|_M_|_\_,\__; |_| |_| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amiga Developer |__/ http://www.nanunanu.org/~oliver/
Amiga F1GP Mailing List ==> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "subscribe amigaf1gp"
--
STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax
ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX"
ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
