> Visually, I'm not a huge fan of either system's default L&F, but I don't > dislike either of them enough to vote -1 on that basis. My > understanding > is that there is some room for customization with either, though, if we > wanted to expend the effort to manage our own L&F. > > The argument for consistency with other Jakarta subprojects > is good in theory, but I don't see most Jakarta subproject websites > using > either yet -- at least for their pages on jakarta.apache.org. It would > also not be an issue if we ever wanted to become a top-level Apache > project (like Maven and Ant did), versus staying under Jakarta.
I was under the impression that the blue/grey l&f was the new Jakarta standard that sites would be moving to. Maybe it's just the default Maven l&f that no one ever bothered to customize. Both the Maven and Forrest l&f are fine with me; I'm just a big fan of consistency so if there is a Jakarta standard we should follow it. David > > > Craig __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
