On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:38:41 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: XHTML Web site updates > > The look and feel you end up with should be almost identical to the existing > site. > I've uploaded a copy for comparison at http://www.ninsky.com/struts/site/ > > If the build is failing then the CSS file won't be copied over to the target > directory so that's why you don't see the formatting. > > As to why it's failing - I'm pretty sure this is a JDK bug, though I'm > surprised you're still having problems on 1.4.2_01. What's the policy on > accommodating JDK bugs? I'll try to find a workaround. > > It would be useful if someone else could run it to see if a pattern emerges. >
WORKSFORME on a just-downloaded CVS tree (19:40 Pacific Time), using JDK 1.4.2-b28 on Red Hat 9.0 Linux. The generated pages do indeed look very much like the original style. > Steve Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
