Joe Germuska said: > >Could stxx's XML processing features be put into Struts 1.x? Yes, but > >before that happens, I think some sort of url feature for forwarded paths > >should be put in first. This would allow a request to easily be forwarded > >to a different presentation system without modifying or overriding the > >request processor. For example, a forward to a jsp page could look like: > >"jsp://Foo.jsp", for tiles: "tiles://Foo.jsp", and for stxx: > >"stxx://Foo.xsl". This feature would make it easy to have multiple > >presentation engines, a feature we say Struts supports, but it doesn't > >really. > > I'm still uncomfortable with minting new URL schemes. Couldn't this > be solved by deploying an additional servlet mapped to handle other > extensions? This is how JSPs work as it is; if your deployment > descriptor gave *.xsl to the STXX servlet, then > requestDispatcher.forward() would give control to STXX just to do the > view rendering. > > I thought this was how the Velocity/Struts integration stuff worked already.
that's precisely how we do it, and everything works just fine. i too think new URL schemes are a redundant complexity. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
