+1 on <html:link module="exercise" action="welcome" /> from a not voting member.
-----Original Message----- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:30 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al) On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 01:00:55 -0600, Gary D Ashley Jr. wrote: > .e.: <html:link action="" module="" ... > > > It seemed that if you have action="" attribute, then module="" was > the next logical step with making struts modular. For us, it > certainly helped provide the glue in a very large data centric > struts application. Large obviously relative to my situation, so > more specifically: 20 modules, 10 state/local government agencies, > 30 roles, 10,000 users (250 core 9am-5pm users), and 6 developers. > > It seems modular link and rewrite tags are a nice step in the right > direction. Well, just one perspective to consider. > > Thanks. Well, that's an interesting idea: <html:link module="exercise" action="welcome" /> versus <html:link action="/exercise/welcome" moduleRelative="false" /> The former does seem cleaner to me. The trick being that the default value for module is the current module :) If you've implemented one like this, tell me, where there any issues about using <html:link module="" action="welcome" /> To indicate the "unnamed" default module? -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]