At 06:21 PM 3/13/2001, Craig wrote: >I also think the current <logic:iterate> behavior is more useful, and >suggest that we change <html:options> to match. > >As a nod towards backwards compatibility, how about if we make >smart enough, as a special case, so that if it receives a String it will >still be treated as a bean name? This behavior would be deprecated, but >would avoid instantly breaking old code. > Vic > Craig Sounds good to me, since both tags support the name attribute. This makes it relatively easy for current users of html:options to change their current code from: collection="myBeanName" to name="myBeanName" rather than to collection='<%= pageContext.getAttribute("myBeanName") %>' Mike
- Mismatch Between <html:options> and <logic:it... Michael McCallister
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options> and <... Kyle Robinson
- trying to get started with Struts 1.0b1 Liz Anderson
- Re: trying to get started with Struts 1.0... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: trying to get started with Struts 1.0... Robert Leland
- I want to de-session my STRUTS app Girish Haran
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options> and <... Fickes, Vic
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options> and... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options>... Michael McCallister
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options> and <... Kyle Robinson
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options> and <... Fickes, Vic
- RE: Mismatch Between <html:options> and... Craig R. McClanahan
- When and where ApacheCon? Maya Muchnik
- Re: When and where ApacheCon? Craig R. McClanahan