On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Fickes, Vic wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Is this proposed change for <html:options> something we can expect to see in
> the near term in a nightly build, or is this a more long term proposal?
>
It's short term. I'm finishing up my last presentation for ApacheCon
(I've got three of them), and then I get to go back to coding for a while.
> Thanks,
> Vic
>
Craig
>
> > I also think the current <logic:iterate> behavior is more useful, and
> > suggest that we change <html:options> to match.
> >
> > As a nod towards backwards compatibility, how about if we make
> > <html:options> smart enough, as a special case, so that if it receives a
> > String it will still be treated as a bean name? This behavior would be
> > deprecated, but would avoid instantly breaking old code.
> >
> > Craig
>
