gjikkl <saul...@netscape.net> wrote : > Jean Zebloski wrote: >> Why would Seamonkey be chewing up 430 megs of RAM all the time? >> > Because it makes ineficient use of cache, but works toward that has been > initiated and they say will continue to improve over time, for now he > have to settle for a FAT SEAMONKEY, that's getting thiner VERY SLOWLY. >
People keep saying to just give it up and use Firefox. With the interminably slow bookmarks loading in SM, I'm getting to agree with them. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
