Anil Garg wrote:
I am reading the m0n0wall documentation (its so well written - kudos
to the author)
What, you specifically buttering me up to get a response? ;)
There is a pointer that for many public addresses to be mapped to
servers inside, m0nowall specifies that "Server NAT should be used"
What would be an equivalent for that in pfsense and if there is any
difference. I could not find any documentation on the web anywhere
which shows the difference.
Is "Server NAT" acheiving the same goal that pfsense would do with a
proxy ARP (under virtual IP)??
Server NAT in m0n0wall is the same as Inbound NAT with VIPs in pfSense.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
