Chris This is a great product and the documentation for m0n0wall is also finest. However, we should rewrite documentation for pfsense because there are different menu items etc. I understand that the efforts are often reliant on community for success and therefore I feel that its even worth breaking this effort down into small recipes and then aggregate.
Please forgive me if spoke beyond the scope of a individual user. BTW, I would be willing to contribute and support that documentation effort. Anil Garg Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anil Garg wrote: > I am reading the m0n0wall documentation (its so well written - kudos > to the author) What, you specifically buttering me up to get a response? ;) > > There is a pointer that for many public addresses to be mapped to > servers inside, m0nowall specifies that "Server NAT should be used" > > What would be an equivalent for that in pfsense and if there is any > difference. I could not find any documentation on the web anywhere > which shows the difference. > > > Is "Server NAT" acheiving the same goal that pfsense would do with a > proxy ARP (under virtual IP)?? Server NAT in m0n0wall is the same as Inbound NAT with VIPs in pfSense. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
