1) Define one network card. It will be your WAN. 2) Define another network card. It will be your LAN. 3) The WAN side, it will be your global IP address 4) In the LAN side, define your IP address 192.168.0.1 with netmask 255.255.0.0 5) Define DHCP service statically with all MAC Addresses, with 192.168.1.X and 192.168.0.Y addresses, or the dynamic range of your preference. 6) Forget the damn virtual IP/Linux workaround or "gambiarra", in good Portuguese. 7) Pay me a beer with goat meat when I go to Natal.
2011/8/30 Ivanildo Galvão - IT Services <ivani...@itservices.com.br> > I do not understand, but because they create a network of 16-bit? Can > youexplain your idea, sorry, but I'm not seeing the solution. > > The pfSense now has 03 virtual NICs, all on the same physical interface, > it isvirtualized on VMware, the physical network card is a single switch. > Type as shown below.**** > > ** ** > > **** > > ** ** > > * * > > *Ivanildo Galvão - **MCP, MCT, MCSA, VSP* > > *Consultor de Tecnologia* > > Tel. (84) 3201 2146 | Cel. (84) 9111 8873**** > > ivani...@itservices.com.br | www.itservices.com.br **** > > Twitter: @ivanildogalvao **** > > **** > > ** ** > > * * > > * * > > * * > > ** ** > > *De:* Isamar Maia [mailto:isa...@gmail.com] > *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de agosto de 2011 21:59 > > *Para:* support@pfsense.com > *Assunto:* Re: [pfSense Support] Subnets in same NIC**** > > ** ** > > > I wouldn't bet on this approach. > > Create a /16 network, 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 and live happy. > > Isamar > > **** > > 2011/8/30 Ivanildo Galvão - IT Services <ivani...@itservices.com.br>**** > > Without doubt, I agree with you. The ideal would be to create VLANs, or > have more than one network interface and each connected to a > network, or switch to adifferent wireless AP, but when the customer does not > have these resources and how've used Linux before and asked to do the > same with pfSense, I accepted to do this on your network. > > So the solution lay in pfSense create Virtual IP, is it? The setting > is the firewalltab, correct? By creating a virtual IPO rager, attached > to the LAN interface?**** > > **** > > * ***** > > *Ivanildo Galvão - **MCP, MCT, MCSA, VSP***** > > *Consultor de Tecnologia***** > > Tel. (84) 3201 2146 | Cel. (84) 9111 8873**** > > ivani...@itservices.com.br | www.itservices.com.br **** > > Twitter: @ivanildogalvao **** > > **** > > **** > > * ***** > > * ***** > > * ***** > > **** > > *De:* Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] > *Enviada em:* terça-feira, 30 de agosto de 2011 21:44**** > > > *Para:* support@pfsense.com > *Assunto:* Re: [pfSense Support] Subnets in same NIC**** > > **** > > **** > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Ivanildo Galvão - IT Services < > ivani...@itservices.com.br> wrote:**** > > Yeah, I know it works with VLAN, but wanted to implement something simpler, > the problem is that the customer had this scenario before working with > Proxywith Linux and pfSense he wants to have the same solution, on > Linux it had asingle NIC which was subdivided > into 03 virtual eth, eth each subnet representsa ranger, according to > the MAC filter stations put Linux on their respective networks. > > I downloaded the version of pfSense RC3 today, here > in VMware Workstationinstalled to see if I can find some option, but so > far I see nothing that addressesthis need.**** > > **** > > That's what IP alias virtual IPs are for. It's generally not a good > practice to do so as having multiple subnets on a single broadcast domain is > ugly, largely pointless, and considered poor network design, but you can. > **** > > **** > > > > > -- > Isamar Maia > Cel. VIVO SSA: (55) 71-9146-8575 > Cel. TIM SSA: (55) 71-9185-5264 > Fixo: (55) 71-4062-8688 > 日本: +81-(0)3-4550-1212 > Skype ID: isamar.maia **** > -- Isamar Maia Cel. VIVO SSA: (55) 71-9146-8575 Cel. TIM SSA: (55) 71-9185-5264 Fixo: (55) 71-4062-8688 日本: +81-(0)3-4550-1212 Skype ID: isamar.maia
