I have one of these, and it's cheap and works well.  The biggest issue is
the sample rate limitation;  with 8 channels you can only run at 44.1 kHz.

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Ben Bloomberg <b...@mit.edu> wrote:

> Has anyone tried anything from ESI audio? It looks too good to be true.
>
> http://www.esi-audio.com/products/gigaporthd/
> It seems like they can be had for around $100.
>
> ben
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Dave Malham <dave.mal...@york.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 29/07/2011 11:30, Michael Chapman wrote:
> >
> >> Now I would like to construct a higher-order sound system, ideally with
> >>> consumer-level (and consumer-priced) components. I don't need a big
> >>> dynamic range, high power, or the best sound fidelity possible, I just
> >>> need a working prototype. This is the part I have found very little
> >>> information on in my research�
> >>>
> >>> My understanding is that 8 channels is the minimum needed for stable
> 3-D
> >>> Ambisonics (rather than planar surround).
> >>>
> >> There was a recent reminder, on this list, within the last month, that
> >> one could use 6 channels (the mid points of the faces of a cube).
> >> I've never heard anyone say they've done it, let alone say it was
> 'nice'.
> >> (The engineering would, also, not be fun ... though you are not obliged
> >> to place speakers mid-wall/ceiling/floor ... you can tilt the cube!)
> >> So I'd stick to eight unless you are really adventurous.
> >>
> >>  We've used it in the dim and distant past and it's not to be
> recommended
> > as it is right at the limits of usability (very unstable image,
> incredibly
> > tiny sweet spot and so on). I would compromise on the quality of the
> > speakers so that I could buy eight, rather than buy only six better ones
> > (ditto for the audio interface and amps)
> >
> >          Dave (signing off for now as I'm off on vacation, hurrah!)
> >
> >
> > --
> >  These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer
> > /***************************************************************
> > **********/
> > /* Dave Malham   http://music.york.ac.uk/staff/**research/dave-malham/<
> http://music.york.ac.uk/staff/research/dave-malham/>*/
> > /* Music Research Centre                                             */
> > /* Department of Music    "http://music.york.ac.uk/";                 */
> > /* The University of York  Phone 01904 432448                        */
> > /* Heslington              Fax   01904 432450                        */
> > /* York YO10 5DD                                                     */
> > /* UK                   'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'   */
> > /*                    "http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/**mustech/3d_audio/<
> http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/3d_audio/>"
> > */
> > /***************************************************************
> > **********/
> >
> > ______________________________**_________________
> > Sursound mailing list
> > Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/listinfo/sursound<
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110730/5280e78b/attachment.html
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110730/cd6a84db/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to