Richard Dobson wrote:

The same is true of stereo too. There are people who just don't hear stereo as stereo. If the response to "lack of perfection" is always "do nothing", nothing will be done. Alternatively, if you use those generic HRTFs, at least ~some~ people will be happy.

BTW, the AES has just announced a project "AES-X212" to develop a file format for HRTF data; "The format will be designed to include source materials from different HRTF databases". See:

http://www.aes.org/standards/meetings/new-projects.cfm


Richard Dobson


The next and valid question is if stereo via headphones actually works so well at all... (Many people have problems, such as in-head effects, lack of perceived "real space", etc.)

If you would fix these problems, then you could probably also reproduce convincing binaural surround via headphones.

Best,

Stefan Schreiber


On 31/10/2012 16:38, Martin Leese wrote:

Peter Lennox wrote:

Yes but...why not simply release stuff for mobiles in a generic binaural -
skip the uhj altogether?


Please, what is this "generic binaural"?

Everyone has an individual HRTF.  If you
release binaural recording using a generic
HRTF then it will work for some and not for
others.

There have been attempts to systemise HRTFs,
so that you set about four different parameters
to produce an individual HRTF, but they never
caught on.

Regards,
Martin


_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound


_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to