I have found amplitude panning to be more effective for some applications. On 9 February 2016 at 22:42, Martin Dupras <martindup...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Out of curiosity - can I ask why you want to use ambisonics as opposed to > > other spatial audio techniques ? > > I'm not sure how to answer. What other techniques did you have in > mind? The reasons are several: I understand at least to some extent > Ambisonics, and I have some (but limited) experience doing it in a > planer array; Ambisonics are flexible and scalable; compatible with > some B-format that my colleagues and I have realised already and will > create in the near future; and can be implemented in the software that > I use (largely PureData and SuperCollider.) > > I don't really see which techniques seriously compete with Ambisonics, > but I'll very happily check them out if you point me to them. > > - martin > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- www.augustineleudar.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160209/1b5482ff/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
