Day Brown wrote: > > Linux is much more powerful than dos. He seems to me to be > wondering what that power can do for him, and so far I've > not seen much that either of us cares about.
I've come to the conclusion that Day likes arguing simply for the sake of arguing. Here, for example, he says about Linux "I've not seen much that either of us cares about." However, when you read the header of his message, you see this: ------------------------------------------------------- X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) ------------------------------------------------------- So, Day has used Linux to dial his ISP, read his mail, and compose a message. Are these not things he cares about? And a second point: if Linux is so "arcane", how can Day (the eternal newbie and Linux hater) manage to get it working well enough to dial his ISP and send a message. And a third point: wouldn't Day's pro-DOS messages be more credible if they were actually sent from DOS? To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
