Have you started on this journal yet?
I plan to do the same thing.
"Kim C. Callis" wrote:
> On 07-Jan-99 Scott Bronson wrote:
> ||
> || Red Hat converted to glibc almost a year ago (RH 5.0). This is the
> || main
> || reason 5.0 was considered difficult to use. With Red Hat 5.2, though,
> || everything seems pretty well sorted. Red Hat just chose to endure the
> || pain earlier rather than later.
> ||
> || - Scott
>
> Actually after doing some sniffing around... I think I am going to set up
> glibc2 via a cross compiler... It seems to be a cleaner solution, and from
> there I can start the slow conversion over. I was reading the
> Glibc2-HOWTO, and that solution seemed a great deal messier. So, there we
> have it. The slow, but worth while conversion over to glibc2. I will be
> keeping a journal which anyone who wants can take a look at to see how the
> process went under SuSE.
>
> ---
> Kim C. Callis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *********************************
> * When it absolutely, *
> * Positively has to be *
> * Destroyed over night! *
> * *
> * (800) MARINES *
> *********************************
> -
> To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
> Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
> archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
