On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Markus Mohr wrote:
> Yes, that's true. In my mind, RedHat 5.2 (I currently use SuSE 6.0, RedHat 5.2
> [German edition], Debian 2.0, Caldera 1.3 [German version] and DLD 5.4 [German
> distributor] in a parallel way) is the actually most advanced Linux
> distribution at the time. Things do work a little bit more smoothly than with
> the SuSE distribution. But that's a personal impression and should not
> disencourage you using SuSE, which implies many features RedHat does not (e. g.
> a very good [at least German] handbook, GUIs etc.).
> Markus Mohr
What 'things' are these? You feedback is valuable. I, like you, use both
RedHat 5.2 and S.u.S.E.( I'm, of course, not using 6.0 but 5.3). I think
overall S.u.S.E. is a much better
dist, and is more advanced, more 'intelligent' in that it is a bit better
designed and thought out, I feel. This gap was more prominant in the older
RedHats, ( 5.0 sucked IMHO --no offense, but it was bug ridden and
crappy. That's just my opinion.) but now RedHat seems to have things a bit
more together and no longer has the private 'award' I once gave it as
'most overrated software product of the year' ( when 5.0 came out).
I do think S.u.S.E. once all transition difficulties are worked out on
libs and compilers will CLEARLY be the better dist, just because the
fundamental design over the years has been more intelligent and I don't
expect this to change.
But back to the point, what do you think are these things that run more
smoothly on RedHat 5.2 ?
-M
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
