--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, "motie_d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Did you ever try to get an audience of any sort with him? I bet if > he knew a > > lot about your case he'd probably care a bit, even if he might fail > to help as > > much as he thought he'd be able to do. > > I never talked to him directly, but I talked to his personal > assistant several times. There was little he could do with all the > other problems on his plate at the time. The Bureaucracy is deeply > entrenched.
I need to make an addition to my own post. One of the issues I discussed with Ventura's assistant is the need for a Legislative Bill that will grant Permits to applicants in 30 days after application if no reason for denial is given. The purpose would be to force the Bureuacrats to shuffle their paperwork in a more timely fashion, or state a need for more time to investigate. No more 'lost'or 'misplaced' paperwork delaying the process, or backlogs of many months waiting for approval or denial. If sufficient reason for denial is found, the reason must be clearly stated and supporting evidence included. No more simple 'Application Denied' without a legitimate and supported explanation of the denial. If an Appeal of the decision is filed, the follow-up investigation should be required to include the supporting evidence used to make the final determination. Ventura's Assistant was very interested in that idea. That was as far as it went. If I can't get Legislators interested, maybe I can get a Judicial Precedent set? I was interested enough that I have a case in process right now, holding an Official personally responsible for his determination. He missed a 30 day deadline to provide supporting evidence for his PERSONAL determination. My allegation is that he made a PERSONAL determination, NOT an Official one, as his Official duty, which would give him Official Immunity from Prosecution, does NOT include conducting Fraudulent investigations. I allowed him an opportunity to provide any evidence he used to make his determination, as Proof (Supporting Evidence) that an Official investigation was conducted. His failure to provide any refuting evidence within the timeframe, or request additional time to comply, leaves my allegation UNREFUTED, and as of this time legally IRREFUTABLE! This only takes me to the point where I now posses IRREFUTABLE evidence that whatever investigation he conducted was PERSONAL, not Official. That leaves him without Official Immunity from prosecution, and Personally liable for damages, which are ongoing and cumulative. His Supervisor has until next Friday to provide me with all pertaining documents in his possesion, or he will be charged also, and also on a Personal basis, as his Official duties do not include Suppression of Evidence or Conspiracy to Commit Fraud. My position is that if an Official investigation was done that is detrimental to me, I have a Right to challenge and Refute/Rebutt any disqualifying evidence. To this time, I have no evidence for or against, and have made the allegation that no investigation was ever done. This is Perjury and Fraud, and will be pursued as a personal affront. I have an air-tight case, and very deliberately left no room for Judicial discretion, and if the Judge won't do his sworn Duty, he will also be Sued on a Personal basis. Tired of Tolerance for misconduct, Motie Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
