Hey Keith,

Elecktrickery, eh?

Chuckle, Chuckle.... smurf.... chuckle....:-)

It is much like plumbing, save for the small fact that most plumbing
fixtures you can see through. Solid state and enclosed switches and similar
apparati require a swift course of mental reconfiguration to not only
understand the conduits that aren't visible but to understand a completely
foreign language when it's put down on paper.

I'd rather stick with those things I can see straight through. Lot simpler
that way...whether with people, plumbing or problemas in general..... :-)

Todd Swearingen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <biofuel@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [biofuel] electric heat, ALeks' method Re: open flame heat
sours


> Hi Mark
>
> > >
> > > Tom Leue said the thermostat failed, so it wasn't an open-flame heat
> > > source but electrical heating. If anything, a rheostat would be
> > > better than a thermostat. Thermostats keep switching the power on
> >and
> > > off to keep the temperature ranging as little as possible either
> >side
> > > of what you're aiming at, which puts a strain on everything
> > > concerned, IMO. A rheostat, once set, won't do that.
> >
> >
> >Actually, there's no problem with thermostats causing a more dangerous
> >condition than other heaters
>
> A thermostat's a heater? It's a heater controller, isn't it?
>
> >(I don' t understand why a rheostat would
> >work differently).
>
> As I understand it (which could well be full of holes) a thermostat
> works as I described it above, a rheostat simply adjusts the power
> supply, lower or higher, and stays as you set it. The one is
> constantly changing, switching on and off, surges up and down, the
> other's constant, less action, less stress on everything, more
> reliable. If that's not right, please correct. Electrickery isn't
> exactly my strong point, I don't dream in volts and amps, need all
> the help I can get (and am duly grateful). They say it's just like
> plumbing, and I suppose it is at first, but that doesn't get you very
> far, nor far enough before the analogy breaks down.
>
> >There are lots of possibilities of equipment
> >failure when you work with electric anything. The solution is ... a
> >thermostat, and doublechecking what you're assuming the automated
> >system will do. My cheapish thermometer is a mechanical
> >automotive-type temp gauge. They come with a variety of adaptors for
> >threadinginto pipe thread fittings- so even if you're weldless, you
> >put a tee in the line before your pump, and when you're ready to check
> >the temp, you run your pump for a minute to get the temperature strata
> >intermixed.
> >
> >Cheap automation is great. I use  heavyduty timers a lot, use cheap
> >timers for bubblewashing, and now use thermostats for processors. But
> >I always assume that they're fallable, I doublecheck everything, and I
> >try and have something in place in case it does fail (like
> >containment, closed systems, doublechecking temperature, etc...)
> >
> >UNfortunately I know that Tom took the same Iowa State University
> >course as I and many others here have done-= and that they certainly
> >DID cover all the safety issues that have been raised here by everyone
> >here. The course also included a section on safety which suggested
> >doing a survey of your plant where you try and identify EVERYTHING
> >that could possibly go wrong and come up with a strategy for dealing
> >with it if it does. common-sense stuff that I think most people do
> >anyway.
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >(I'm particularly interested if this would work for
> > > >any rendition of the Foolproof method my Aleks Kac.)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyway, the first stage of the acid-base method needs the temp
> > > maintained for an hour, but the second stage for 1.5-2.5 hours,
> >maybe
> > > not so easy just on pre-heating.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >I did fine with ALeks' method in wintertime (well a california winter)
> >working outdoors, with my Michelin Man bubblewrapped processors- the
> >insulation can maintain that temp if there's enough of it. ONe of the
> >things I worried about with this method was that it looked like higher
> >energy use- but it didn't add up to much once I installed loads of
>
> ... insulation I guess. That's certainly one way. There are others,
> it depends what you do. Heat can be free after all. There are other
> ways too. I find it most efficient, and even if you don't get the
> heat bit optimised, it has other efficiencies.
>
> All best
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Biofuels list archives:
> http://archive.nnytech.net/
>
> Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to