What I have enjoyed most so far about being in this group is the 
presentation of ideas that go beyond what I am able to imagine on my 
own.  I've not found the people in my local community that spend 
their time considering these things.  I know that they're out there, 
I just haven't figured out where to look for them yet.

I hope to strive toward self sufficiency, in a community which is 
self reliant.  As others have pointed out, finding others in the 
community to participate in this type of scheme is not always easy.  
I once lived among such people, but as we have grown older we have 
also grown apart, each going our separate ways.  Regrettable, but 
seemingly a normal part of life (people pairing off, raising 
families, moving out of the area...).

I feel like I'm being a bit disorganized in my thoughts here.  Hope 
people don't get too lost trying to follow.

Brian

--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Brian
> 
> >As usual, there is more to the story than just my mind has been 
able
> >to imagine on its own.
> 
> Yes, as usual - I suppose we all say that (or should). But Brian, 
why 
> leave your mind to imagine on its own? Join and share with others, 
as 
> you said in another message about bartering knowledge and skills 
in 
> learning about biofuels. With this particular subject, in its very 
> many facets, there's a tremendous heritage and tradition to gain 
from 
> and a great deal of excellent work done in the last 80 years or so 
on 
> top of that, ongoing. Many, many people are working on this, they 
> (we) have good networks, and I'm quite sure that includes 
imaginative 
> minds near you.
> 
> >I have been thinking a great deal lately
> >about self sufficiency, and taking baby steps toward same.
> 
> A distinction is made between self-sufficiency and self-reliance. 
> It's perhaps a little concocted but I think it's useful anyway. 
> "Community self-reliance" is a commonly used term and it's much 
more 
> forgiving. With self-sufficiency, you'd not only have to make your 
> own biodiesel but your own soap too. With self-reliance, maybe one 
> household which had something to do with catering would supply the 
> WVO, another would make biodiesel, a third would make soap, and 
> they'd share the results, making all three much more efficient 
than 
> if they each had to do all three of those things. You see the 
> principle.
> 
> >One of
> >the factors in my interest in biofuels.
> 
> That's also how we see biofuels, as one factor. Biofuels is not 
our 
> main interest at Journey to Forever - important, yes, but we don't 
> think it's the most important part of our project, just a part.
> 
> You might care to have a look at the Small Farms section of our 
> website, and the Small Farms online library, and also the 
Appropriate 
> Technology section.
> 
> http://journeytoforever.org/farm.html
> Small farms: Journey to Forever
> 
> http://journeytoforever.org/farm_library.html
> Small Farms Library - Journey to Forever
> 
> http://journeytoforever.org/at.html
> Appropriate technology: Journey to Forever
> 
> >In this, like everything
> >else in life, what I am learning is that there is always more to
> >learn.
> 
> :-) Around when my contemporaries started turning 50 I heard quite 
a 
> lot of them saying things like that (including me), sometimes with 
> some dismay: "The more I learn the less I know!" I suppose 
> Buckminster Fuller got it right (as usual): "The more we learn the 
> more we realize how little we know." No need for dismay.
> 
> Regard
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> 
> >Brian
> 
> 
> 
> >--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello Brian
> > >
> > > >I do have a problem with one point made in this interview.  He
> >uses
> > > >Iowa agriculture destroying natural habitats as an argument 
that
> > > >vegetarians are actually more cruel to animals than 
carnivores.
> > >
> > > He uses industrialised agriculture as his example far too 
often,
> >and
> > > as a result his entire structure is built on sand. 
Industrialised
> > > agriculture is a very recent and aberrational phase that will 
soon
> > > pass, hardly a basis for considering the whole 10,000 years of
> > > agricultural history, along with civilization, the future, and 
all
> > > the fish.
> > >
> > > >If
> > > >I remember correctly, about 80% of the corn raised in Iowa 
goes to
> > > >feed cattle.
> > >
> > > There are some interesting figures here:
> > > US grain exports
> > > http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_food.html#grainexports
> > >
> > > Actually the whole page is interesting.
> > >
> > > >Direct consumption by humans would be much more
> > > >efficient, meaning less demand and therefore less need to 
destroy
> > > >natural habitats.  I am primarily vegetarian on these grounds
> > > >exactly, not due to some concern about harming animals.  It's
> >simply
> > > >more efficient for me to digest plant products myself than to
> >allow
> > > >some animal to do it for me and then consume the animal.
> > >
> > > Trouble is, the real problem of agriculture is over-production.
> > > There's no shortage of food in the world, a billion-odd people
> >don't
> > > go hungry because there isn't enough food, there's more than
> >enough,
> > > more than there's ever been, per capita. So growing more food 
to
> >feed
> > > the hungry not only isn't the answer to the problem, but almost
> > > invariably leads to more starvation (eg the so-called "Green
> > > Revolution").
> > >
> > > Forget about the "modern" specialised farms where one farm 
grows
> > > grain and another farm raises beef and so on. That's not 
farming
> > > (husbandry), it's extraction (like mining). Sustainably, you 
need
> >to
> > > have it all going on on the same farm. When properly managed,
> > > integrated, mixed farms are indefinitely sustainable, with low
> >input,
> > > high output and high quality. (And low to zero fossil-fuel
> >inputs.)
> > > Fertility maintenance procedures on such farms are very well
> > > established. The basic principle of it is that, as always in
> >nature,
> > > it requires both plants and animals. Soil fertility cannot be
> > > maintained without animals - some portion of what's returned to
> >the
> > > soil has to pass through the gut of animals, preferably more 
than
> >one
> > > species. Ideally it take all of them, cattle, sheep, pigs and
> > > poultry. If you're doing that well you can have a highly 
efficient
> > > operation that's kind to everything - the soil, the water, the
> > > plants, the livestock, the local biodiversity, the farmer, his
> > > pocket, his family, their health, the local community, the 
nation,
> > > the world, all the fish too, and everything but ADM and
> >ExxonMobil.
> > > (Which is the problem - we only forego all these things for the
> >sakes
> > > of the likes of ADM and ExxonMobil.)
> > >
> > > Without the animals, the whole thing is going to wind down 
sooner
> >or
> > > later, probably sooner, unless you're to rely on ever higher
> >levels
> > > of off-farm chemical fertilizer inputs, in which case the whole
> >thing
> > > is going to wind down sooner or later anyway, but with a lot 
more
> > > pollution and leaving a wreck that will be much harder to 
restore
> >to
> > > life.
> > >
> > > So I'd agree the animals are all wrong in the current set-up, 
but
> > > then so is everything else. Getting rid of the animals is not 
the
> > > answer, the whole thing has to be ditched, and will be, 
whether by
> > > choice or not remains to be seen. Sounds a bit like fossil-
fuels
> >and
> > > biofuels eh? Food and fuel issues share a lot of common 
ground .
> > >
> > > Best
> > >
> > > Keith
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Brian
> > > >
> > > >--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > > > > Interview with Manning, follow-on to his previous article 
in
> > > >Harpers.
> > > >them worse.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com.  Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to