On Sep 24, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Michael Friebel wrote:
> > If a thing (whatever it may be) is testable, then it > will, in time, be discovered & acknowledged in our > process of science. If a phenomenon is not testable, > then of what relevancy can it be to us? > > > All that matters is that it is testable. By whatever > way we may perceive something, if it is testable, then > it is relevant & comprehensible. Hmmmm... Clearly stated, but rather narrow, don't you think? Seems like a great deal of what normal people consider "relevant" would simply have to be ignored, which of course is what so-called "science" does much of the time. The best scientists, though, have pushed the boundaries. -K _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
