Hello Steve

>Don't farmers have the right to sell their corn to whoever they want to
>sell it too?

In theory. In practice they have no control over the prices. In real 
terms the price of corn in the US in 2006 was only half the price in 
1980, because US farm policy shifted to overproduction. The current 
prices have nothing to do with production, and though the prices are 
higher the chaotic market is making life more difficult for farmers, 
not easier.

>Even if corn is going to make ethanol, so?  So the world
>has increased its demand for oil, and that means that oil costs more,

:-) You fell for it eh?

You have to pay more attention if you want to get that right, and 
it's something you ought to get right. Especially since we had all 
that figured out here in March already, well ahead.

"It should be obvious to you all that the [gasoline] demand is 
outstripping supply, which causes prices to go up." - President 
George W. Bush, Associated Press, Mar. 5, 2008

But there is no shortage of oil, demand is not outstripping supply. 
Production is up, well ahead of demand, and the gap is widening, 
there's a surplus of oil, not a shortage.

"On the same day the President and our Energy Secretary made those 
foolish comments, no less an authority than ExxonMobil (XOM) Chief 
Executive Officer Rex Tillerson was quoted by Marketwatch as saying, 
'The record run in oil prices is related more to speculation and a 
weakening dollar than supply and demand in the market.' He added, 'In 
terms of fundamentals, fear of supply reliability is overblown.'" See 
There Is No Gas Shortage," by Ed Wallace, Business Week, April 1, 2008
<http://www.businessweek.com/print/lifestyle/content/apr2008/bw2008041_945564.htm>

Many other commentators have since agreed. Not caused by supply and demand.

>that means that we need to find ways to offset that, so we make corn
>into ethanol, and now corn costs more.

That's a bit mixed up.

>Maybe if the oil producing
>countries of the world didn't need indoor skiing and rotating towers(see
>Dubai),

So? See Las Vegas. 
<http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Luxor_Hotel.jpg>

>and such a large profit margin, then we would have gone along
>consuming just like we had been.

Wrong again. OPEC and the other oil producers lost control of pricing 
when NYMEX started trading crude in 1983.

Four years ago Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi told a Center for 
Strategic and International Studies conference in Washington: "Oil 
markets are complex and not subject to control by anyone. Even Saudi 
Arabia and other members of OPEC with their vast reserves have only a 
limited ability to keep prices in their preferred range. This is 
particularly true when the primary factors driving prices are things 
other than the supply and demand of crude oil in international 
markets. This is the case today. Supplies are readily available. Any 
buyer or seller of crude oil will tell you this. Rather, prices are 
being driven by other factors including fears of instability in key 
oil-producing countries and regions, the movement of large investment 
funds into communities like oil, just in time inventory practices, 
refining bottlenecks and the industry's struggle to produce 
sufficient quantities of spec gasoline in the U.S. that meets 
currently mandated environmental standards. ... OPEC is only one 
factor that impacts oil prices and the higher crude oil production 
does not guarantee that there is more gasoline available for U. S. 
consumers."
<http://www.mail-archive.com/sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg34915.html>

Not much has changed since then except the price, and Ali al-Naimi's 
list of the causes has proved accurate, especially the bit about 
large investment funds.

Al-Naimi put it a little more strongly last month: "There is no 
justification for the current rise in prices."

Paul Craig Roberts added: "What the minister means is that there are 
no shortages or supply disruptions. He means no real reasons as 
distinct from speculative or psychological reasons." See "Why the Oil 
Price Is High," by Paul Craig Roberts, 11/06/08 
<http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20072.htm>

"As business and consumers consider the implications for them of 
crude oil selling at US$130-plus per barrel, they should bear in mind 
that, at a conservative calculation, at least 60% of that price comes 
from unregulated futures speculation by hedge funds, banks and 
financial groups using the London ICE Futures and New York Nymex 
futures exchanges and uncontrolled inter-bank or over-the-counter 
trading to avoid scrutiny (see Speculators knock OPEC off oil-price 
perch, Asia Times Online, May 6, 2008). " See "Oil price mocks fuel 
realities," by F William Engdahl, May 24, 2008
<http://www.mail-archive.com/sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg72733.html>

Plenty of confirmation of that too.

Deborah Fineman, president of Mitchell Supreme Fuel Co. in New 
Jersey, said: "Energy markets have been dictated for too long by 
hedge funds and speculators, who artificially manipulate the numbers 
for their own benefit. The current market isn't based on the sound 
principles of supply and demand but it is being rigged by companies 
and speculators who are jacking up prices for their own greed."

Former Big Oil man and banker Harry C. Johnson blames the CFTC (which 
keeps rolling back the already hopelessly weak controls on 
speculation), the Department of Energy, the Administration, and 
Congress, as "asleep at the switch on an issue that is probably 
costing U.S. consumers $1 billion per day."

Johnson said: "Some industry experts, who profit greatly from the 
high price of crude, have stated openly that the worldwide economic 
price of crude, absent speculators, would be around $50 to $60 per 
barrel."

According to MarketWatch: "Speculative activity in commodity markets 
has grown 'enormously' over the past several years, the Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee said in a news release. 
It pointed out that in five years, from 2003 to 2008, investment in 
the index funds tied to commodities has grown by 20-fold -- to $260 
billion from $13 billion."

It's hot money fleeing the dot.com crash and the subprime mortage 
loan crisis, and all it cares about is profit.

>Oil costs around $1-$15 to produce a
>barrel.  It's sold at $143 a barrel.  Someone's making a helluva profit
>in there.

There's no mystery about who, and how.

Hedge fund superstar Michael W. Masters told the US Senate Committee 
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in May: "Index 
speculators have now stockpiled, via the futures market, the 
equivalent of 1.1 billion barrels of petroleum, effectively adding 
eight times as much oil to their own  stockpile as the United States 
has added to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve over the last five years.

"In the popular press the explanation given most often for rising oil 
prices is the  increased demand for oil from China. According to the 
DOE, annual Chinese demand for petroleum has increased over the last 
five years from 1.88 billion barrels to 2.8 billion barrels, an 
increase of 920 million barrels. Over the same five-year period, 
Index Speculators' demand for petroleum futures has increased by 848 
million barrels. The  increase in demand from Index Speculators is 
almost equal to the increase in demand from China.

"Institutional investors have purchased over 2 billion  bushels of 
corn futures in the last five years. Right now, Index Speculators 
have  stockpiled enough corn futures to potentially fuel the entire 
United States ethanol  industry at full capacity for a year That's 
equivalent to producing 5.3 billion gallons of  ethanol, which would 
make America the world's largest ethanol producer.

"At 1.3 billion bushels, the current Wheat futures stockpile of Index 
Speculators is enough to supply every American citizen with all the 
bread, pasta and baked goods they can eat for the next two years.

"Index Speculators' trading strategies amount to virtual hoarding via 
the commodities  futures markets. Institutional Investors are buying 
up essential items that exist in limited  quantities for the sole 
purpose of reaping speculative profits."

See: Testimony of Michael W. Masters, Masters Capital Management, 
before the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and 
Governmental Affairs, May 20, 2008
http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf

>Even barring the fact that some of this corn is being
>diverted to other uses, it costs more to produce it when diesel goes up.
>Those tractors don't run on water.

Not just the tractors, the whole shambolic agri-industrial process of 
corn production depends on fossil-fuel inputs. Anyway, production 
costs don't have much to do with prices, and neither does supply and 
demand, same as oil, same reasons, same culprits.

Eg.: "The hot new favorite among traders is betting on packages of 
energy and agricultural futures. Called CCO's (collateralized 
commodity obligations), they are like their subprime cousins, CDO's 
(collateralized debt obligations). Their performance is linked to 
rising commodity prices; the higher the prices, the more profit to 
the CCO." And the more money floods into the casino. See "Who 
Benefits From High Food Prices?", by Nomi Prins, June 20, 2008, 
Mother Jones
<http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/20/9772/>


See also "Deadly Greed: The Role of Speculators in the Global Food 
Crisis", Der Spiegel, April 23, 2008
<http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,549187,00.html>

And so on.

Not all these links in this message have been posted to the list, but 
all the information is there in the archives, and it's mostly 
happened since you joined, it shouldn't be news to you. If you don't 
follow the list discussions then check the archives before posting a 
message and getting it all wrong.

Best

Keith


>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Chip Mefford
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:14 PM
>To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] The food emergency and food myths
>
>
>Keith Addison wrote:
>>  http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=552
>>
>>  Seedling  > July 2008
>>
>>  The food emergency and food myths
>>
>>  Why Bush is wrong to blame Indians for the rise in food prices
>>
>>  Vandana Shiva *
>
>I really enjoy Vandana Shiva's input. It's clueful and very well
>thought out.
>
>That said;
>
>
>  >SNIP
>>  agribusiness in the current food crisis, both through speculation and
>>  through the hijacking of food into biofuels,
>
>
>I keep hearing about this 'hijacking of food into biofuels' argument.
>
>Anyone have the numbers to back this up?
>
>The increased 'demand' for ethanol in the US, is at least partially
>due to the gigantic surpluses of 'feed corn' over the last decade.
>That corn is only food in an abstract sense, it's mostly all starch,
>not edible directly. I'm sure this year the corn yields will be down,
>no doubt. But somehow, I don't see the correlation.
>
>
>
>--
>Chip Mefford
>--------------------
>Before Enlightenment;
>     chop wood
>     carry water
>After Enlightenment;
>     chop wood
>     carry water


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to