I agree with Andy's observation.  Walmart is tied to growth capitalism.  
Every year they must outperform their previous year's revenue for their 
shareholders.  We need community stakeholders, not out-of-town shareholders.

-- Katie Q-J


Andy Goodell wrote:
> "Walmart could add stability to the market by adding some coordination 
> to production, so I don't see their involvement as being necessarily bad."
>
> Possibly, but when Farm A increases their production to meet Walmarts 
> needs to a point where without this huge buyer they collapse, and then 
> Farm B tells Walmart they can sell the same item for 3 cents cheaper, do 
> we trust Walmart to keep buying from Farm A or just ditch them for the 
> cheaper Farm B? I wouldn't trust Walmart to help stability...
>
> -Andy
>
> Joel and Sarah Gagnon wrote:
>   
>> Interesting questions.
>>
>> Wegman's found that in order to source locally-produced produce, they had 
>> to abandon their centralized purchasing model and let each store develop 
>> relationships with farmers in their immediate area. If Walmart wants to do 
>> local, they will confront the same need. One of the things that drove local 
>> farmers out of production in the first place was the centralized buying of 
>> the supermarkets as they came to dominate the food scene. Any move toward 
>> relocalization is likely to expand opportunities for local producers. 
>> Walmart could add stability to the market by adding some coordination to 
>> production, so I don't see their involvement as being necessarily bad. 
>> Their lowest possible cost model, though, will no doubt create downward 
>> pressure on prices, which is not a good thing for local producers. The only 
>> way to get prices down is by scaling up production and substituting 
>> machinery for hand labor (or using cheap imported labor).
>>
>> It will be quite some time (if ever) before human labor can compete with 
>> machines. The impediment to using more machines is the capital cost, which 
>> do not make sense for small producers. They would make sense of purchased 
>> and used cooperatively, though, so this too is an area where collaboration 
>> would be sensible. It might even be essential to maintain viability if 
>> competition intensifies, as some of you appear to believe will be the case 
>> and we transition to higher energy costs.
>>
>> At some point, energy costs will be high enough that labor will compete 
>> more effectively with machines. As that happens, production costs will 
>> increase, even with markedly lower average wages in the face of declining 
>> jobs in other sectors. Food costs will rise, in line with the 
>> labor-intensive "boutique" production of today. That will put the squeeze 
>> on many lower income people to feed themselves and their families. The way 
>> to reduce costs for them will be the traditional one of substituting their 
>> labor for money by growing food themselves or bartering their labor for food.
>>
>> We may see a temporary reversal of the trend toward increasing energy 
>> prices as the world slips into a protracted recession, reducing energy 
>> demand. I expect a resumption of the upward march of prices with in a few 
>> years, though, and I hope we can take this respite and use it to position 
>> ourselves for the future. Investments in collaboration to lower costs in 
>> the short run will pay dividends in the long run as well.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>> At 10:33 PM 10/8/08 -0400, you wrote:
>>     
>>> At 03:43 PM 10/8/2008 -0400, you wrote:
>>>       
>>>> [Karl North:]
>>>>
>>>> | These initiatives are all good food for thought, but we need to
>>>> | bear in mind that Vermont is a special case.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but so is Tompkins County.
>>>>         
>>> Jon--I agree with your suggestion that we are positioned to be successful
>>> with the "Vermont model".
>>>
>>> ...part deleted...
>>>
>>>       
>>>> So the question is whether a local farm cooperative of the kind described
>>>> in the article can hang on until the cost of fuel finally levels
>>>> the playing field by making Wal-Mart food more expensive than
>>>> locally produced food.
>>>>         
>>> And I wonder what this time framework will be?  The problem is that
>>> Wal-Mart has an economy of scale not seen locally.  However, things are
>>> going to change with the local Wal-Mart.  Wal-Mart wants to expand by
>>> 40,000 sq. ft. to become a Super Store, meaning that they would add a
>>> Wegmans-scale supermarket to the existing
>>> Everyhing-You-Could-Ever-Want-That-Is-Made-In-China store.  (I know this as
>>> I am on the City of Ithaca Conservation Advisory Council and we are
>>> currently reviewing the environmental impacts of such an
>>> expansion.)   Would they get on the local and organic band wagon?  And if
>>> they did, how would this affect the truck farm industry in the Central
>>> Finger Lakes?  GreenStar, Wegmans, Tops, Ludgate's and a host of other
>>> outlets are already involved in promoting local and organic or at least
>>> "natural" foods, so perhaps the expanded Wal-Mart would give a boost to the
>>> local food economy... assuming that anyone would want to sell to
>>> Wal-Mart?   Lots of stuff going on.   Tom
>>>
>>> ******************************************
>>> Tom Shelley
>>> 118 E. Court St.
>>> Ithaca, NY 14850
>>> 607 342-0864
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> Compost Educator and Sustainability Scion*
>>>
>>> What Does Zero Waste Mean?
>>> "If it cant be reduced, reused, repaired, rebuilt, refurbished, refinished,
>>> resold, recycled, or composted, then it should be restricted, redesigned,
>>> or removed from production."
>>> Berkeley Zero Waste Resolution
>>> See  http://www.cityofberkeley.info/council8/newsletter.pdf
>>>
>>> *noun:  a shoot or bud of a plant, esp. one for planting or grafting
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, 
>>> please visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/
>>>
>>> RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
>>> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, 
>> please visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 
>>
>> RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
>> free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   

-- 
_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to