Good point. Anyone else? Jim? -----Original Message----- From: CcomputerGameCollector [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 10:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Greetings
Where the conditions are listed, it clearly states that NM is "no defects, no wrap", but you mentioned that NM can have the modifier of (S)? I certainly understand the need for NM (S), but perhaps you should modify that page a bit to clear things up? Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:36 AM Subject: RE: [SWCollect] Greetings > We were working under the premise that no opened game truly "mint." Mint is > too often used and abused by sellers, and different people have different > levels of detail when determining mint status. Therefore, if it has ever > been opened, NM is the best it gets. NM (S) is also possible if there is > one extremely minor defect, but the box is still sealed. NM (S)(T) is also > common for a game that simply has a tear in the shrinkwrap but is otherwise > new looking. > > Hugh > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect' Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect' Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/
