"Mark Winterhalder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:55:04 +0200):
> Don't know about the name, though... eh, hxswf is just the swf-readwrite-library. if the haxe effort gets to have swfmill-like functionality, it will be swfmill-0.3 (see below). > So, is swfmill called "final" now? :) there's no such thing as "final" :) seeing that swfmill performs fine in most cases, it's probably time to remove the "alpha" disclaimer (and replace it with the usual we'll-shoot-yer-foot-dont-complain one). so i'd call the 0.2.x branch "stable"- implying maybe that your swfml-ll and -simple files will keep working throughout the branch. should a haxe-based swfmill come along, it will likely be swfmill-0.3 (an odd number denoting a development/unstable version)-- and 0.2.x will stay around until 0.3 goes 0.4 (only when it matches or supercedes 0.2's functionality). If anyone should be confused by this versioning scheme: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Version_numbering > will buy Dan a beer sweet. -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
