> On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote: > > > on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote: > >>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution >>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >>> “each” is just what's required to make “so” read sensibly. >>> >>> (0..<100).filter(so: isPrime) >>> >>> doesn't make any obvious sense. >> >> Shouldn't there be a term of art exemption for `filter(_:)`. Otherwise why >> not use `select(where:)`. > > Because `where(...)` is better. But all such changes are out of scope > here.
Are you asking/suggesting that it be in scope somewhere else or merely removing it from the conversation as tangential? -- E _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
