on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com >> <http://erica-at-ericasadun.com/>> wrote: >> > >>>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution >>>>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >>>>>> “each” is just what's required to make “so” read sensibly. >>>>>> >>>>>> (0..<100).filter(so: isPrime) >>>>>> >>>>>> doesn't make any obvious sense. >>>>> >>>>> Shouldn't there be a term of art exemption for `filter(_:)`. Otherwise >>>>> why not use `select(where:)`. >>>> >>>> Because `where(...)` is better. But all such changes are out of scope >>>> here. >>> >>> Are you asking/suggesting that it be in scope somewhere else or merely >>> removing it from the >>> conversation as tangential? >> >> Yes, as I've been saying, we should take up the basenames of functional >> methods, considering whether the terms of art should be considered >> sacred cows, as a separate proposal. >> >> -- >> Dave > > A or B? > > Yes. > > -- E, moo > p.s. I'll start a thread
There's already http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=CAKA%3djdbxiC%5fq0Fe%3dXc%3dmSWu7OtGxMgAQyb0QMA6%5fOaiiLB3foA%40mail.gmail.com I referred to it in my introduction of this thread. -- Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
