on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Dave Abrahams <dabrah...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> >> on Mon Jun 27 2016, Erica Sadun <erica-AT-ericasadun.com> wrote: >> > >>>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution >>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >>>> “each” is just what's required to make “so” read sensibly. >>>> >>>> (0..<100).filter(so: isPrime) >>>> >>>> doesn't make any obvious sense. >>> >>> Shouldn't there be a term of art exemption for `filter(_:)`. Otherwise why >>> not use `select(where:)`. >> >> Because `where(...)` is better. But all such changes are out of scope >> here. > > Are you asking/suggesting that it be in scope somewhere else or merely > removing it from the > conversation as tangential?
Yes, as I've been saying, we should take up the basenames of functional methods, considering whether the terms of art should be considered sacred cows, as a separate proposal. -- Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
