On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 06:20:44AM -0700, Vinzent Steinberg wrote: >> IMHO it's awesome. Let's switch to this way of distribution of sympy >> and its third party modules. (Additionally there could be of course a >> tar ball with all dependencies included.) What do you think? > > Eggs work by monkey patching sys.patch, which has some "interesting" > consequences. IMHO thisis not acceptable. It has been pointed out that > these consequences can be avoided by patching setuptools. This patch is > not happening, and setuptools development process is not transparent. I > consider setuptools as a neat toy, but not mature and useable for > production. Not everybody agrees with me :).
I do! :) Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
