On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Chris Smith <smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> I don't think we should merge things into master, if it means making >> it more difficult to merge the branch. We should do whatever it takes >> to get this in, using our manpower. > > I'm not following the vocabulary nuances here. What do you mean by not > "merg[ing] things into master"? Do you mean merge vs rebase and commit?
My fault, I was not clear, sorry. I meant cherry-picking things into the master, and leaving the rest of the branch for somebody else to painfully rebase and update (if that's the case). > >> >> Given that besides Aaron and me, nobody else volunteered to do the >> release, given our current manpower I think we should merge this in >> (without cherry picking), and then release. Of course, Aaron should >> have the last word on this. > > If I had a flowsheet of what to do for the release, I am on break for two > weeks and could http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/NewRelease > work on it *if* I had access to a workstation to do testing (if there is a > lot of that involved). I have access only to Mac and Windows, both about the > same speed, taking about 11 minutes to run the test suite and another few to > run doctests. Mac should be enough to get things going. We should do rc1 first, then possibly rc2. People would try it, run tests and so on. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
