Hi,

thanks Ronan, Vinzent, Aaron, Mateusz and Brian for participating in
the discussion. First of all, I would like to assure you that there
are no hard feelings on my side, and hopefully we can learn something
form it, and resolve things. I would like to write my very clear
opinion on some of the issues raised in this thread:

1) This feature is a core feature, that SymPy should have

2) It is ok to give -1 for reviews, as long as you give a plan for the
author of the patch, how he can fix it, so that it is acceptable. It
is also ok to give -1 without saying anything else (this case), but
then this stops progress, because it is not clear what I can do to get
this in. As such, when you do such "-1" as a reviewer, you should
think twice what this is going to cause, and initiate a discussion
about this.

3) Vinzent asked, why I was upset. So the reason being, that something
that I personally strongly believe belongs into sympy was given -1
without any constructive technical criticism. As far as I know, we
have never pushed in a patch, that was clearly given -1 as this one.
So as such, I felt, that this means, this can't go in. And as such I
was upset, because suddenly I will not be able to achieve the goal to
be able to do things that people do with Mathematica with SymPy, not
because the code was not there, but because some of sympy developers
gave it -1, because they don't share my vision. And as such, I was
upset. I think that's understandable, isn't it? :) In any case, let me
reiterate, that I am upset at the situation, not Ronan, or anybody
else.

4) So now the question is what to do now. Well, my first idea was to
convince Ronan to give it +1. That's of course the best. But if that
is not possible, we can of course push it in anyway (given all the +1
that it got from other developers). But that is really something, that
I, as a democratic person, really hate to do. Because "-1" is like a
veto. That's how it worked so far. Maybe this point needs further
discussion among us. At least I always considered "-1" as a veto. And
as such, the code can't be pushed in, unless the situation is
resolved.

Ondrej

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.

Reply via email to