Lukas, > Question is: Is some reason for full synapse history in SVN > repository? Or start by current Rel.38 is enough?
It seems to me that you'd be the best one to answer that. Even if some users *might* like the history, unless you've already got the history (and already in Subversion), that would probably be a lot of work. And I don't really see the great benefit to working on managing the project instead of working on the project, especially when there's limited time to doing all of that, when other things get priority! Actually, I'm a little surprised that you're considering exposing a revision control system. Aren't you the only committer to this project? Wouldn't it then be easier to just use whatever source code management tool you feel like using internally? Are you considering allowing other committers? In a project like this, that might be more work than having contributions submitted to you for consideration, approval and inclusion. And unless you're already very comfortable with SVN, which would make that the natural choice, there seems to be a major shift underway towards distributed source code / version control systems, and even especially to one in particular: git. It might be worth waiting a while longer to see how that goes... Just some possibilities, questions and thoughts... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
