>
> Actually, I'm a little surprised that you're considering exposing a
> revision
> control system. Aren't you the only committer to this project? Wouldn't it
> then be easier to just use whatever source code management tool you feel
> like using internally? Are you considering allowing other committers? In
> a
> project like this, that might be more work than having contributions
> submitted to you for consideration, approval and inclusion.
Well, imho, I think SVN is useful even if you are the only committer for a
project. You could have a couple of pc at office, one with windows and the
other one with Linux and getting an svn up is very easy to update your
changes quickly and try your cross-platform code. Further, you could have
also the chance to develope and extending your software at home and, why
not, getting another svn up and a further svn ci to have these changes at
home and, the day after, at office ;-). This is just my experience :-)
The main commands are not so difficult to manage so ...
Antonio
--
Antonio Sanguigni alias slapshot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GioveLUG (Linux User Group) - http://www.giovelug.org
Edupup (Educational distro) - http://edupup.pieroni.biz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
synalist-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
