Lukas Gebauer wrote: >> In general, I completely agree. But I think there are some special >> circumstances here: Primarily, there's only one manager and committer... >> though I do think the rest of us could help Lukas more if good systems and > > Releases still be published in distribution ZIP packages. SVN repository > have two major aspects: > > - I am working on three computers. (yes, this have solution in my private > SVN repository, I know!)
Which in itself already is a great reason to have source version repository. I'm not certain if my personal opinion or preferences have any say in the matter, but these days, if I'm working on a project whose expected lifespan is more than just a couple of days - and even if I would/could/should be the only developer ... I still use such a system. Because sometimes it just so happens that you make a bad decision down the road and actually need to roll back the changes and start thinking of the stuff from another angle. In such times (and on many others also) a source version controlling software is a lifesaver. But that's just my two cents... don't know if they're worth a dime :) -- Markku Uttula ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
