> I think having SVN is a good idea for any open project. In general, I completely agree. But I think there are some special circumstances here: Primarily, there's only one manager and committer... though I do think the rest of us could help Lukas more if good systems and communications were in place. And, the fact that quite a few open projects are currently migrating to git... might indicate that, once some rough spots are ironed out, git might be a better solution in a short time. (Some recent articles make it sound fantastic, even if it still has quite a learning curve... [and I have no brain cells left!] things like 1/30 the storage space needed... being far faster... the distributed benefits...)
> There ends up being more testers/helpers than you think, especially > since synapse is fairly popular amongst delphi/fpc users. Oh... ;-) I think there are a LOT of testers... But only one committer... No? And it might be just as easy in a single-direction distribution (-only) situation to post fixes to an unstable branch in the forum. I am not at all disagreeing with the benefits of SVN access. I just thought that the special circumstances and the current migration of so many projects to git might warrant taking a little more time to consider the options. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
