> If any other mentors have a different vision that mine, please correct me !

Nope, sounds good to me.

Colm.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 2/13/12 12:48 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
>
>> Hello there,
>> it's still me - sorry for bothering, but I really have many questions
>> and issues popping out from my mind :-)
>>
>> Now it's about website and logo.
>>
>> As far as I've understood, we need a status page [1] and a website [2].
>>
>> My questions arise especially about [2]:
>>
>> 1. Syncope IdM has already a website [3]: my idea is that such website
>> will remove any project information or documentation as soon as ASF site
>> and wiki will be ready; moreover, [3] will contain a link to ASF site
>> and wiki and will provide only information related to paid activities
>> about Apache Syncope as provided by Tirasa [4], my company: is this fine?
>
> The base idea is that the official Syncope web site will be hosted by The
> ASF. That Tirasa sells support on Syncope is not The ASF business, as soon
> as Tirasa attribute The ASF for the ownership. For instance, the Tirasa Web
> Site and documentaion *must* refers "Syncope" as "Apache Syncope", and
> mention that "Syncope, Apache Syncope and Apache" names are The ASF
> properties.
>
> You can even 'advertize' Tirasa on the ASF Syncope web site as a company
> offering support on Syncope, as soon as other companies requesting to offer
> some support on Apache Syncope are allowed to do the same thing. Although I
> would say that until there is a diverse community around Syncope, I would
> not encourage such an innitiative, but it's just me :)
>
>>
>> 2. Syncope IdM logo [5] does not obviously comply with [6] nor [7], so
>> my proposal would be to elaborate a compliant logo out of current one
>> and to send it here for checking: what do you think?
>
> That's just fine, as soon as those who designed the logo agree to see the
> logo to be modified. Note that you just have to add a little TM in the logo.
>
>>
>> 3. Syncope IdM has Twitter [8] and Identi.ca [9] accounts: should we put
>> them under PPMC control in some way? We had a similar discussion at
>> Cocoon PMC a while ago, right Simone?
>
> I don't think it's necessary. Again, what happens outside of the dev and
> private ML does not happen, from the ASF POV, so it's just fine to have
> external channels being used, as soon as the attribution to The ASF is
> correctly exposed.
>
> If any other mentors have a different vision that mine, please correct me !
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to