Hi Darrell

Welcome back!

How do you figure that Johnson was only a good sprinter, not a great one?

Given his times and dominance, this position is only supportable if you
argue that he was a good sprinter who became great solely because of drugs.

Thus, by my reckoning, either you have to argue that everyone else was clean
and that Johnson's winning margin represents the margin drugs give you, OR
you have accept that Johnson was not the only clean athlete and that his
winning margin was down to greater talent.

Which is it? Either he would have been a great anyway, or he was the only
100m runner taking drugs in 1988.

Justin

> ----------
> From:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Tuesday, October 17, 2000 1:50 am
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: t-and-f: Mo Greene
> 
> Such an arbitrary discussion.  I think we can pretty much agree that carl
> is 
> the greatest to date.  Time will be the only definition for Mo.
> As for Ben, he is no where near the top 5, and it has nothing to do with
> his 
> drug bust.  He was good sprinter, but that is all.  I do not think Libford
> is 
> near the top 5 either.  He won 2 majors (commendable), but other than that
> he 
> was a participant in some of the greatest races ever run.  He never truly>
  dominanted his event at any point.  
> The most dominant sprinters we have seen in our time are Carl, Mo, and 
> Frankie.  Big time performers have been Carl, Mo, Valery, Donovan (ugh),
> and 
> Dennis Mitchell.  That�s right I said Dennis.  Check the records and you
> will 
> find him everywhere.  Check American records and you cannot see a 
> championship without his name in it somewhere.
> 
> Darrell Jr.
> 
> 


**********************************************************************
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
If you are not the addressee indicated in the message (or responsible 
for the delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy
or deliver this message to anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the 
sender by reply Email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer
does not consent to Internet Email for messages of this kind. 

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not 
relate to the official business of Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO Ltd or its
Group/Associated Companies shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by them.

Abbott Mead Vickers.BBDO Limited.
Registered in England.
Registered Number 1935786.
Registered Office 151 Marylebone Rd, London NW1 5QE.
Telephone 020 7616 3500.
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to