In a message dated Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:15:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< << on a personal note if your asking me( not that my opinion matters) if I think
that the Mackowiak beating antonio in the OG and running 45.14 as opposed to
Pettigrews 45.42 is "credentials" enough to garner a world #10 ranking than I
say NO. >>
As i said to Mr. Caine in an earlier post on the same subject, can you give me a
better choice? I actually think there are a couple (Mackowiak wasn't in my top 10, but
your original question was what credential he might have, so i gave one) who might
have better cases, but none of them really fit the profile of a "true world ranker."
But if you're going to be so quick to condemn a choice, I think you need to be
prepared to back up your strident commentary with a viable alternative.
It was not a vintage year at the No. 10 level in the 400.
gh
