> I don't know what the answer to this question is (my gut feeling is it should count), but I must object to Ed's analogy >below. Hardly the same thing -- the original question refers to the same school, just before it had the league >categorization, while the response is two different schools (which obviously circumvents the league aspect of the >question).
My analogy was that an athlete should have the same relationship to his school in terms of setting a record as a school should have to the league. Anything the athlete does before or after joining a school will not be considered for that school's record (even if he attended no school before that), just as anything a school does before or after joining a league should be considered for that league's record. - Ed PArrot
