On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:31 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4 February 2010 07:24, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I guess...but this might be tricky for editors to deal with when way > > direction is reversed. > > Not really, think of the bits between nodes as segments, you apply the > information to a segment, except width which is applied at the > specific point, the rest is just vector type informaiton.
Upon reversal of the way, editors would have to automatically convert [1] to [2]. http://www.myimgs.net/images/lmwa.gif http://www.myimgs.net/images/mjrp.gif Still feasible, but it is worth noting. > > Also, a "maxspeed" conceptually applies to a way, not a node. This is > > therefore only worth doing if you really really want to avoid > > splitting ways. > > The problem at the present is ways get split for a lot of reasons, > this may reduce the amount of splitting. I know. But if you are happy with splitting (as I am), then the current solution is fine. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging