On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:32 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 February 2010 07:22, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It is one option for tagging width, but users would then still need to >> make some assumption about the direction in which width is measured >> (probably the bisection of the angle between previous/following nodes) >> and interpolate between nodes (probably linearly). > > If you assume the node is the mid point of the way, width at that > point is simply the width, and the width at the surrounding points is > that width and the rest is just vector math.
I have no idea what you're talking about. This is my interpretation of your idea, as it stands: http://www.myimgs.net/images/plxo.gif If I've got the wrong idea, please draw a diagram of what you mean :) >> It's also (at first glance) a very big change to the OSM data model. >> There may be other problems, but that's the main one I can think of. > > Bigger than relations? No idea. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
