On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2014-04-02 13:51 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. <ricoz....@gmail.com>: > It is not wrong by itself but there are many circumstances > where it > is plain wrong > > +1, it is not wrong as long as there aren't any crossing / overlapping > objects that have a different layer in OSM (e.g. no layer tag in OSM = > implicit layer=0) but are physically or conceptually on the same layer in > reality. Basically you'd have to put all these other objects as well to > layer=-1, which in turn would most probably require you to put even more > objects on layer=-1 and so on.
So how would bridge+layer=1 => bridge+layer=2 transition happen, given such a non-sense rule. Definately a road continuing is supposedly "on the same layer" as the previous part? Does it imply layer is cast to stone for the whole road network because all connections to a node are definately sharing the level at the node. Or what did you mean?!? -- i. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
